By themselves these transgressions would not have been worth noting.ĥ) The Discovery of Youthful Folly. Once textual fidelity became an issue, reporters found earlier cases in which Biden had failed to give proper citation to Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. He was on autopilot.”Ĥ) The Press Piles On. Top Aide Tom Donilon claimed that Biden failed to credit Kinnock because “he didn’t know what he was saying. The Kinnock kleptomania was particularly damaging to Biden since it underscored the prior concerns that he was a shallow vessel for other people’s ideas.ģ) A Maladroit Response. “The basic rap against Biden,” explains Democratic Pollster Geoff Garin, “is that he’s a candidate of style, not substance.”Ģ) An Awkward Revelation. He Biden brouhaha illustrates the six deadly requirements for a crippling political scandal.ġ) A Pre-Existing Subtext. Here’s how TIME described why the fallout was so intense: His mouth - or rather, what he failed to say - got him in trouble again. More examples of misattribution came to light, and the plagiarism scandal became more memorable than his leadership during the Bork confirmation hearing. Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock giving a speech and Biden clearly quoting Kinnock at the Iowa State Fair without attribution. “For Chairman Biden, the hearings could provide a spark for his presidential campaign by giving him a chance to show his mettle in front of a national television audience.”īut Biden didn’t get a chance to shine during the Bork hearings in the way he had hoped.Ī few days before they began, video surfaced that spliced together footage of U.K. Biden, in charge of the confirmation hearings, oversaw what was seen as potentially “the culminating ideological showdown of the Reagan era,” as TIME put it back then. In particular, as Biden chaired the Judiciary Committee, he hoped to gained more national attention during the uproar over polarizing conservative Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork. His position in the Senate offered him a chance to show his skill. The then-44-year-old Senator was great at giving inspiring speeches and people were attracted to his youthful energy, but he could also come off like a “hothead,” as he did in his “ angry” questioning of Secretary of State George Shultz when the Senate heard testimony about South Africa in 1986. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |